Dr. Ed Kendrick says: February 6, 2012 at 7:17 pm
“Making the reaction to Madonna’s act an issue of feminism diverts attention from the satanic symbology that permeates the act.
The symbology and phraseology are hedonistic and satanic. It has nothing to do with feminism.”
It definitely symbolized an old ritual tribute to Lucifer/Baphomet.
Essentially, Madonna was dressed as Inanna-Ishtar, a powerful goddess of Egyptian/Babylon times who resided over war, love (or most accurately lust), sexuality, fertility (or lack thereof), and prositution.
Perhaps, this is acknowledged in the reference to:
“Madonna is that forbidden thing, the [Nietzschean] creative woman” http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/10/qanda-naomi-wolf-madonna
Which is derived via a German philosopher who believed the after life less capable of the physical life, and the ideal person could convey Ubermensch otherwise through creativity rather than suppression. Ubermensch means superman rather the goal to the final solution and practice of race purity practiced by Nazi Germany.
Watch quite a few videos and the NDAA 2012 is made to look cool and sexy via lust through sex appeal. If a picture is worth a 1,000 words, the symbol is worth much more.
Dr. Kendrick is right; this isn’t about who did what and what gender or gender movement. It’s about the underlining symbolism portrayed.
Considering, you choose the word Nietzschean (which has root in anti-religion and rather atheistic in addition to roots in the master-race belief); I have to suspect that you know for all purposes the perfomance more mirrored that of a High Priestess symbolizing a Goddess than a simple performance. To each their own.
madonna? there are other artists who have gone farther and are more important. I kind of feel like madonna is more supreme business woman than artist, like 60, 40 or 70, 30. she’s also one hell of a dancer. but P.J. Harvey is the artist to talk about in these regards. take a listen to “Rid of Me”, there’s some art feminists should think about.
It's nice to see an informed person who understands how to dig up the truth, revealing the truth despite any risks it may or may not put you at.. thank-you... I live in Canada so while it is a seperate country, Canada sometiems acts like the sibling of the USA so what happens there will at least indirectly affect us, if not in fact directly.... thankyou for your work...
Making the reaction to Madonna’s act an issue of feminism diverts attention from the satanic symbology that permeates the act.
The symbology and phraseology are hedonistic and satanic. It has nothing to do with feminism.
Don’t worry about Madonna. She has done okay.
Dr. Ed Kendrick says: February 6, 2012 at 7:17 pm
“Making the reaction to Madonna’s act an issue of feminism diverts attention from the satanic symbology that permeates the act.
The symbology and phraseology are hedonistic and satanic. It has nothing to do with feminism.”
It definitely symbolized an old ritual tribute to Lucifer/Baphomet.
Essentially, Madonna was dressed as Inanna-Ishtar, a powerful goddess of Egyptian/Babylon times who resided over war, love (or most accurately lust), sexuality, fertility (or lack thereof), and prositution.
Perhaps, this is acknowledged in the reference to:
“Madonna is that forbidden thing, the [Nietzschean] creative woman” http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/10/qanda-naomi-wolf-madonna
Which is derived via a German philosopher who believed the after life less capable of the physical life, and the ideal person could convey Ubermensch otherwise through creativity rather than suppression. Ubermensch means superman rather the goal to the final solution and practice of race purity practiced by Nazi Germany.
Interesting how male and female through pop-culture rather advocates lifestyles underlining in the 7 deadly sins like Greed, Envy, Pride, Lust, and etc, which is also underlined in the superiority of people over God. Not to mention Pop-Culture have also made the contents of this article cool, in style, and thus desirable http://naomiwolf.org/2011/12/how-congress-is-signing-its-own-arrest-warrants-in-the-ndaa-citizen-arrest-bill/
Watch quite a few videos and the NDAA 2012 is made to look cool and sexy via lust through sex appeal. If a picture is worth a 1,000 words, the symbol is worth much more.
Dr. Kendrick is right; this isn’t about who did what and what gender or gender movement. It’s about the underlining symbolism portrayed.
Considering, you choose the word Nietzschean (which has root in anti-religion and rather atheistic in addition to roots in the master-race belief); I have to suspect that you know for all purposes the perfomance more mirrored that of a High Priestess symbolizing a Goddess than a simple performance. To each their own.
madonna? there are other artists who have gone farther and are more important. I kind of feel like madonna is more supreme business woman than artist, like 60, 40 or 70, 30. she’s also one hell of a dancer. but P.J. Harvey is the artist to talk about in these regards. take a listen to “Rid of Me”, there’s some art feminists should think about.